[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#907624: What ffindex do we want to package
Steffen Möller
steffen_moeller at gmx.de
Fri Jan 4 22:57:11 GMT 2019
Heya, I have replied, at least I had typed it :o/
So, yes, I had chosen that version of ffsort_index to get hhsuite to
compile. I have no idea if there are other reverse dependencies on
ffindex, my priority is on hhsuite.
Cheers,
Steffen
On 04.01.19 18:17, Michael Crusoe wrote:
> I think 0.9.9.7+sog+git20160415.14274c9-1 is the source of the recent
> FTBFS of hhsuite: https://bugs.debian.org/917495 as our packaged
> version is missing the "ffsort_index" function.
>
> The hh-suite github repo contains a submodule pointing at their fork
> of ffindex at ~ 2017-06-01:
> https://github.com/soedinglab/hh-suite/tree/v3.0-beta.3/lib →
> https://github.com/soedinglab/ffindex_soedinglab/tree/360e4176ece531be34a94298c808349916d016ac
>
> I suggest that we package it as part of hhsuite until another package
> needs it.
>
> hhsuite does provide "*-Source*" packages that include ffindex, so we
> wouldn't need a multi-source build.
>
>
>
> În joi, 20 dec. 2018 la 11:59, Andreas Tille <andreas at an3as.eu
> <mailto:andreas at an3as.eu>> a scris:
>
> Ping?
> Steffen, if you did not had a specific reason I assume it was by
> mistake and will replace the Segfaulting code by the original one.
> If I do not hear from you I assume you will agree.
> Kind regards, Andreas.
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 09:53:38AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after reading
> https://github.com/soedinglab/ffindex_soedinglab/issues/4
> > I came to the conclusion that we somehow picked the wrong fork of
> > ffindex. For me it seems very probable that if we pick the old
> codebase
> > bug #907624 which was introduced when choosing this will vanish
> if we
> > revert to the previously packaged code base. I have a local commit
> > which is doing this:
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
> > index 6a26115..c409f4f 100644
> > --- a/debian/changelog
> > +++ b/debian/changelog
> > @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
> > +ffindex (0.9.9.7+sog+git20160415.14274c9-1) UNRELEASED;
> urgency=medium
> > +
> > + * The previous location on Github was an improperly choosen fork
> > + (see https://github.com/soedinglab/ffindex_soedinglab/issues/4)
> > + Here the version is now named "0.9.9.7+sog" (Saved On Github)
> > + to make it alphabethically later than the previous one.
> > +
> > + -- Andreas Tille <tille at debian.org <mailto:tille at debian.org>>
> Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:16:09 +0100
> > +
> > ffindex (0.9.9.7+soedinglab+git20180802.74550c8-1) unstable;
> urgency=medium
> >
> > * Fix watch file (version should actually be
> +git20171201.74550c8 but
> > diff --git a/debian/watch b/debian/watch
> > index 91b4f38..b47f123 100644
> > --- a/debian/watch
> > +++ b/debian/watch
> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > version=4
> >
> > -opts="mode=git,pretty=0.9.9.7+soedinglab+git%cd.%h" \
> > - https://github.com/soedinglab/ffindex_soedinglab.git HEAD
> > +opts="mode=git,pretty=0.9.9.7+sog+git%cd.%h" \
> > + https://github.com/ahcm/ffindex.git HEAD
> >
> >
> >
> > Upstream at github.com/ahcm/ffindex
> <http://github.com/ahcm/ffindex> was extremely quick to tag a
> > release and so it is at least active.
> >
> > Steffen, was your pick intentional or did you just stumbled by
> chance
> > over the other fork? Are you OK with reverting to the old code?
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> > Andreas.
> >
> > PS: I reported the segfault issue to the according fork anyway
> > https://github.com/soedinglab/ffindex_soedinglab/issues/7
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://fam-tille.de
> >
> >
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
>
> --
> Michael R. Crusoe
> Co-founder & Lead, Common Workflow Language project
> <http://www.commonwl.org/>
> Direktorius, VšĮ "Darbo eigos", Vilnius, Lithuania
> https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2961-9670
> <https://impactstory.org/u/0000-0002-2961-9670>
> mrc at commonwl.org <mailto:mrc at commonwl.org>
> +1 480 627 9108 / +370 653 11125
More information about the Debian-med-packaging
mailing list