[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#916835: marked as done (gemma ftbfs on arm64 and mips64el where it built before)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2019 20:15:02 +0200
with message-id <20190123181502.GA32285 at localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#916835: gemma ftbfs on arm64 and mips64el where it built before
has caused the Debian Bug report #916835,
regarding gemma ftbfs on arm64 and mips64el where it built before
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
916835: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=916835
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Matthias Klose <doko at debian.org>
Subject: gemma ftbfs on arm64 and mips64el where it built before
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:29:26 +0100
Size: 5323
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20190123/3f31296c/attachment-0002.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk at debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#916835: gemma ftbfs on arm64 and mips64el where it built before
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 20:15:02 +0200
Size: 2287
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20190123/3f31296c/attachment-0003.mht>