[Debian-med-packaging] Problems with gdcm-3.0.X

Mathieu Malaterre malat at debian.org
Thu Oct 17 11:29:21 BST 2019


On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 2:51 PM Mathieu Malaterre <malat at debian.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Gert,
>
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 4:03 PM Gert Wollny <gw.fossdev at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, den 02.10.2019, 17:35 +0200 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre:
> > >
> > >
> > > So issue was introduced when switching from subdirs() to
> > > add_subdirectory(). You may want to cherry-pick:
> > >
> > > 36ad8a228e602b4724ff627cda3b2ba427640ddc
> > >
> > > Also I needed:
> > >
> > > d24eaa39ed041d91c414069149a344d20fb9adf8
> > >
> > > to fix a compilation error (parallel build).
> > >
> > > You'll also need to fix d/rules:
> > >
> > > # See #664188
> > > sed -i -e "s/FATAL_ERROR/STATUS/g"
> > > obj-*/CMake/ExportConfiguration/CMakeFiles/Export/lib/x86_64-linux-
> > > gnu/gdcm-2.8/GDCMTargets-*.cmake
> > >
> > >
> > > Maybe use an '*' instead of '2.8'
> > >
> > > I am releasing 3.0.3 in a couple of minutes so you may want to wait
> > > for this release (it does contains two of your patches, thanks !)
> > >
> > > -M
> > Thanks, I've updated the build accordingly and also updated to 3.0.3.
> > Unfortunately the build is still failing with the same error:
> >
> >  https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/gdcm/-/jobs/349317
>
> Thanks for your hard work. As a minimal double-check could you confirm
> this is the correct link ? I am seeing reference to '3.0.2' in the
> 'console' log (you need to use 3.0.3).

could you confirm this log was pointing at 3.0.2 ? thx

>
>
> > Any other pointers?
> >
> > Best,
> > Gert
> >
> >
> >



More information about the Debian-med-packaging mailing list