[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#977454: spdlog: FTBFS with fmtlib 7.1.3

Andreas Tille tille at debian.org
Wed Dec 16 14:27:44 GMT 2020


Hi again,

happily autobuilders were lucky enough.  Unfortunately not all debci architectures:

   https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/s390x/s/spdlog/8886705/log.gz

S390x is the only architecture - but if I understood correctly this can fail at
random. :-(

Kind regards

       Andreas.

On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 09:49:59PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Shengjing,
> 
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 02:19:43AM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 2:17 AM Andreas Tille <tille at debian.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Control: tags -1 help
> > >
> > > Hi Shengjing,
> > >
> > > I've applied your patch and tried to build the package I get:
> > >
> > > Test project /build/spdlog-1.8.1+ds/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu
> > >     Start 1: spdlog-utests
> > > 1/2 Test #1: spdlog-utests ....................   Passed    4.78 sec
> > >     Start 2: spdlog-utests-ho
> > > 2/2 Test #2: spdlog-utests-ho .................***Failed    4.60 sec
> > >
> > > 50% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 2
> > >
> > 
> > If you rebuild again, it may succeed.
> 
> Argh - I confirm a second build (on a different machine) was
> successfully but not the following autopkgtest inside the same pbuilder
> environment where I've built the package.  But here Test #1 failed.
> 
> > These are flaky tests.
> > Yes, I have met it when I rebuild. w/ or w/o the changes..
> 
> Michael, would you mind contacting upstream about this issue?
> 
> Kind regards
> 
>      Andreas.
> 
> -- 
> http://fam-tille.de

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



More information about the Debian-med-packaging mailing list