[Debian-med-packaging] orthanc-gdcm_1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Andreas Tille]

Hi Sébastien,

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:50:12AM +0200, Sébastien Jodogne wrote:
> The long promised "complex upstream work" has been done in the context
> of the Orthanc 1.7.2 release, that was published two weeks ago.
> 
> The Orthanc source distribution now allows to build a shared library
> called the "Orthanc framework" whose purpose is to share code between
> all the official Orthanc plugins.

Very nice.  I used the chance to run routine-update on the package to
modernise packaging a bit.  Debhelper compat level 13 is now forcing
dh_missing issues to be failures.  Since I'm not sure whether you
are aware that not all files are installed or whether this is really
a missing I'd like you to confirm this:


...
   dh_missing
dh_missing: warning: usr/share/orthanc/plugins/libServeFolders.so exists in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere 
dh_missing: warning: usr/share/orthanc/plugins/libModalityWorklists.so exists in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere 
dh_missing: warning: usr/include/orthanc/OrthancCDatabasePlugin.h exists in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere 
dh_missing: warning: usr/include/orthanc/OrthancCPlugin.h exists in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere 
dh_missing: error: missing files, aborting
        The following debhelper tools have reported what they installed (with files per package)
         * dh_install: liborthancframework-dev (35), liborthancframework1 (2), orthanc (9), orthanc-dev (1), orthanc-doc (72)
         * dh_installdocs: liborthancframework-dev (0), liborthancframework1 (0), orthanc (0), orthanc-dev (0), orthanc-doc (0)
         * dh_installman: liborthancframework-dev (0), liborthancframework1 (0), orthanc (3), orthanc-dev (0), orthanc-doc (0)
        If the missing files are installed by another tool, please file a bug against it.
        When filing the report, if the tool is not part of debhelper itself, please reference the
        "Logging helpers and dh_missing" section from the "PROGRAMMING" guide for debhelper (10.6.3+).
          (in the debhelper package: /usr/share/doc/debhelper/PROGRAMMING.gz)
        Be sure to test with dpkg-buildpackage -A/-B as the results may vary when only a subset is built
        If the omission is intentional or no other helper can take care of this consider adding the
        paths to debian/not-installed.
make: *** [debian/rules:20: binary] Error 25
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess returned exit status 2


Kind regards

         Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de