[Debian-med-packaging] python-wordcloud_1.6.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Andreas Tille]

Dear Sean,

thanks again for your detailed look.

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 02:13:29AM +0000, Sean Whitton wrote:
> 
> +----------------------+
> |   REJECT reasoning   |
> +----------------------+
> 
> I think you also need to filter out doc/images/a_new_hope.png as now
> that the examples are gone it is no longer in its preferred form for
> modification...
> 
> Not sure about images/no_image.png; please determine whether there is
> source for that or if it already in its preferred form for
> modification.

I removed the complete doc/ and guided the user in README.Debian
to the upstream docs in my new upload.
 
> Thank you for your time and contribution!

Many thanks to you

      Andreas.

PS: In principle python-wordcloud is *currently* not such an important
    package - I was just once packaging what I'm using and other DDs
    used it in some handouts as well.  I just like to respond to you quickly
    to free you and me to think about this later again from scratch.

    Currently the Debian Med team has lots of packages that are quite
    hot for fighting COVID-19.  Do you see any chance to mark these as
    more interesting for ftpmaster than others?  I would love to establish
    some communication channel what we as the Debian Med team consider
    important and what is not so important.  Currently r-cran-locfit is
    probably our most wanted package. In case you might find time to
    check r-cran-locfit in addition to the discussion in its WNPP bug
    I recommend to read this news about the new version:
      https://lists.debian.org/debian-r/2020/03/msg00023.html
    Thanks a lot for your attention, Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de