[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#978032: python-cobra: autopkgtest regression in testing

Adrian Bunk bunk at debian.org
Sun Jan 24 22:07:27 GMT 2021


On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 09:58:57PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Source: python-cobra
> Version: 0.19.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid bullseye
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ci at lists.debian.org
> User: debian-ci at lists.debian.org
> Usertags: regression
> 
> Hi Maintainer
> 
> The autopkgtests of python-cobra recently started to fail in testing [1].
> I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below.
> 
> Regards
> Graham
> 
> 
> [1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/python-cobra/testing/amd64/
> 
> 
> ==================================== ERRORS ====================================
> ______________ ERROR at setup of TestManipulation.test_escape_ids ______________
> 
> filename = '/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cobra/test/data/textbook.xml.gz'
> number = <class 'float'>
> f_replace = {'F_GENE': <function _f_gene at 0x7f75f8c3cc10>,
> 'F_GENE_REV': <function _f_gene_rev at 0x7f75f8c3cca0>, 'F_GROUP':
> <function _f_group at 0x7f75f8c3cf70>, 'F_GROUP_REV': <function
> _f_group_rev at 0x7f75f8531040>, ...}
> kwargs = {}
> doc = <libsbml.SBMLDocument; proxy of <Swig Object of type
> 'SBMLDocument *' at 0x7f75f402cc60> >
> cobra_error = CobraSBMLError('Something went wrong reading the SBML
> model. Most likely the SBML model is not valid. Please check
> tha...ame)`\nIf the model is valid and cannot be read please open an
> issue at https://github.com/opencobra/cobrapy/issues .')

This is also a FTBFS.

Trying to upgrade to 0.20.0 for checking whether that would help:
After some minor adjustments the first blocker is missing
diskcache (#940625).

cu
Adrian



More information about the Debian-med-packaging mailing list