[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#988644: Defined Term: ISO 2022 IR 87 is not supported

[Mathieu Malaterre]

Jörg,

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:38 PM Jörg Riesmeier <debian at riesmeier.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Mathieu
>
> > I've removed explicit usage of ICU, since support will be equivalent
> > when using stdlibc (iconv), with the added bonus that we remove a
> > dependency to ICU.
>
> I'm not sure whether "stdlibc (iconv)" really supports all DICOM character
> sets, e.g. "ISO 2022 IR 87" and "ISO 2022 IR 159" are not tested by the
> regression test case "dcmdata_specificCharacterSet_1" (see "dcmdata/tests/
> tspchrs.cc").
> As far as I know, _all_ defined DICOM character sets only work as expected when
> using "libiconv", i.e. the original implementation (as explained before).

Yes, this is what I defined as "support will be equivalent".

Further detailed at:

* https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/dcmtk/-/commit/a533a4acb57242e8c9e9f011e3ba083c8382da97#92c53ca292f6a209c5328fba1c6a1801e28e51c3_151_163

Thanks again