[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1026056: closed by Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org> (reply to Olivier Sallou <osallou at debian.org>) (Bug#1026056: fixed in logol 1.7.9+dfsg-6)
Lev Lamberov
dogsleg at debian.org
Fri Dec 16 08:40:39 GMT 2022
Hi Paul,
Чт 15 дек 2022 @ 21:10 Paul Gevers <elbrus at debian.org>:
> On 14-12-2022 10:15, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>> * rebuild against new swi-prolog (Closes: #1026056)
>
> I can't but feel a bit uneasy by this "solution". Apparently it's not
> properly tracked by dependencies, so it doesn't show up on the Release
> Teams auto transition trackers [1] (which would typically trigger the
> Release Team to trigger binNMU's, but if nothing else at least would put
> it on the radar). For C based libraries this "solution" typically hides
> real problems. Do we believe we can improve the logol/swi-prolog
> situation in a similar way, or is the effort really not worth it
> (apparently autopkgtest catches the issue, but the solution isn't
> visible from the failure).
> [1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/
Thanks for your attention! Yes, I should have initiated transition.
Guess, I will do this in the future. There are not so much packages
depending on swi-prolog, just logol and eye. Only these packages require
rebuilding with a major upgrade of swi-prolog. Anyway, transitions are
preferable way, I agree.
Cheers!
Lev
More information about the Debian-med-packaging
mailing list