[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1006384: closed by Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org> (reply to Olivier Sallou <osallou at debian.org>) (Bug#1006384: fixed in logol 1.7.9+dfsg-2)

[Paul Gevers]

Dear Tobias, Michael,

Can be please have an answer to the question below? Your lack of answer 
is blocking migration to testing of multiple packages.

On 07-03-2022 17:28, dogsleg at riseup.net wrote:
> Paul Gevers писал 2022-03-06 21:36:
>> On 06-03-2022 11:30, dogsleg at riseup.net wrote:
>>> As I can see, there is only one reverse build-dependency on swi-prolog
>>> apart from eye and logol, that is ppl. It is a C++ library providing
>>> SWI-Prolog interface. I tried to build it against swi-prolog from
>>> unstable on amd64 porterbox and the build was successful (including
>>> tests, which are unfortunately not autopkgtest-ready).
>>
>> Is this enough to say the ABI change doesn't effect ppl?
> 
> I'm not sure whether ppl depends and/or somehow uses some particular
> swi-prolog ABI, I tried to run tests from ppl source package with
> ppl and swi-prolog binary packages installed (from unstable), but
> with no success. I just don't know right now how to run them
> correctly (these are C++ source code, as far as I can tell). So,
> CCing uploaders of ppl.
> 
> Tobias, Michael, is it possible that ABI changes in swi-prolog may
> break binaries of ppl in unstable? How can we test it? As quoted
> above, I already tried to build ppl against the newest swi-prolog
> in unstable, and ppl was built successfully.

Paul
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20220317/bb3253b3/attachment.sig>