[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1012893: [Help] anfo: ftbfs with GCC-12

[Aaron M. Ucko]

Étienne Mollier <emollier at emlwks999.eu> writes:

> I believe in the case of anfo, that warnings about auto_ptr /
> unique_ptr are red herrings.  If I search for "error:"s, then I
> get some errors about no match for operator<:

Oops, good catch.  As for unique_ptr, this is evidently one of those
situtations where whoever makes the substitution (possibly upstream
after all at some point) will need to make additional changes to make it
clear that their usage is safe.  In particular, the ...Reader
constructors will probably want to accept auto_ptr<> by rvalue reference
rather than by value:

  std::unique_ptr<google::protobuf::io::ZeroCopyInputStream>&& is

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?amu@monk.mit.edu