[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1068025: marked as done (FTBFS: error: invalid conversion from ‘size_t*’ {aka ‘unsigned int*’} to ‘long unsigned =?UTF-8?Q?int*=E2=80=99?=)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 29 Mar 2024 22:47:29 +0100
with message-id <162ce72d-638c-4582-b095-0ca1fcf22d5a at orthanc-labs.com>
and subject line Re: FTBFS: error: invalid conversion from ‘size_t*’ {aka ‘unsigned int*’} to ‘long unsigned int*
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068025,
regarding FTBFS: error: invalid conversion from ‘size_t*’ {aka ‘unsigned int*’} to ‘long unsigned int*’
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1068025: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068025
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar at debian.org>
Subject: FTBFS: error: invalid conversion from ?size_t*? {aka ?unsigned int*?} to ?long unsigned int*?
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 01:52:13 +0500
Size: 4411
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20240329/f5f4afb0/attachment.eml>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: =?UTF-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien_Jodogne?= <s.jodogne at orthanc-labs.com>
Subject: Re: FTBFS: error: invalid conversion from ?size_t*? {aka ?unsigned int*?} to ?long unsigned int*
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 22:47:29 +0100
Size: 4605
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20240329/f5f4afb0/attachment-0001.eml>