[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1063191: libcifpp-data: Incorrect URL in update-libcifpp-data script

Maarten L. Hekkelman maarten at hekkelman.com
Mon Oct 14 08:39:41 BST 2024


Hi Andreas,

Apparently there has been a misunderstanding. The bug was fixed and all 
code was uploaded but nobody responded to upload the package to NEW. 
Maybe it wasn't clear enough, my message for this.

Anyway, we're half a year further now and I merged in the latest 
changes. Hopefully someone is willing to upload this time?

-maarten


Op 12-10-2024 om 22:55 schreef Andreas Tille:
> H Maarten,
>
> ping?  IMHO its not acceptable to leave bugs tagged important
> unaddressed for such a long time.  Please be so kind to act
> soon on libcifpp and its dependencies.
>
> Thank you
>      Andreas.
>
> Am Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 11:42:04AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
>> Hi Maarten,
>>
>> Am Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 10:55:37AM +0100 schrieb Maarten L. Hekkelman:
>>> The URL's were updated in upstream some time ago. The debian version of
>>> libcifpp (and all dependent tools) are a bit out of date.
>> OK.
>>   
>>> The problem I have is that development of libcifpp is a bit too fast.
>>> Whenever I break the ABI I have to ask for someone to upload a newer
>>> version. And last time this apparently did not went well and so the update
>>> stalled. I don't remember who I asked to update, but since that didn't
>>> happen I forgot about it.
>> Its a good idea to send sponsoring requests to the Debian Med mailing
>> list.
>>   
>>> Anyway, so I had an upload ready for version 5.2 and libcifpp is now at
>>> version 6.1. I will thus have to prepare yet another update and then upload
>>> all depending packages. I'll see what I can do.
>> It would probably be a good idea to update libcifpp and all dependencies
>> to the current version.
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your contribution
>>      Andreas.
>>
>> -- 
>> http://fam-tille.de

-- 
Maarten L. Hekkelman
https://www.hekkelman.com/



More information about the Debian-med-packaging mailing list