[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1109178: Bug#1109178: Bug#1109176/1109177/1109179: psfex/scamp/source-extractor

[Étienne Mollier]

Hi all,

Ole Streicher, on 2025-07-14:
> Am 14.07.25 um 07:48 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> > In #1109178 (emmax: fails to dist-upgrade from bookworm (related to
> > libatlas3-base removal)), Etienne added a Breaks to libatlas3-base to
> > work-around the issue.
> > 
> > Maybe the break could be set in libpacke instead.
> 
> liblapacke already has a
> 
> Breaks: [...], libatlas3-base (<< 3.10.3-14)
> 
> which should work for a direct update from bookworm (Bookworm has
> 3.10.3-13), but not from a later testing (latest version in testing was
> 3.10.3-14).
> 
> However, this break was already detected by apt:
> 
> > > > Broken liblapacke:amd64 Breaks on libatlas3-base:amd64 < 3.10.3-13 @ii mK > (< 3.10.3-14)
> > > >   Considering libatlas3-base:amd64 1 as a solution to liblapacke:amd64 0
> > > >   Holding Back liblapacke:amd64 rather than change libatlas3-base:amd64
> 
> where I don't understand the solution taken by apt. However, even apt
> considers liblapacke as "broken"; and I don't see why adding a break to
> psfex & Co. would solve this.

It doesn't.  I wrapped up the Breaks in emmax yesterday but
mis-tested the upgrade and thought that resolved the issue, but
the upgrade from bookworm to sid of emmax still doesn't happen
today.  I reopen #1109178.

> I'd really tend to re-assing these bugs to lapack.

I tend to agree.

Have a nice day,  :)
-- 
  .''`.  Étienne Mollier <emollier at debian.org>
 : :' :  pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c  8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
 `. `'   sent from my alarm clock
   `-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20250714/010d6777/attachment.sig>