[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1098072: volpack: ftbfs with GCC-15

Adrian Bunk bunk at debian.org
Mon Oct 6 14:13:15 BST 2025


On Mon, Oct 06, 2025 at 02:19:58PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Adrian,

Hi Andreas,

>...
> I wonder whether it might be more effort for you to simply push your
> patches to Debian Med Git (any DD has push permissions).

yes, this would be more effort for me.

Right now I might be fixing RC bugs in ~ 100 packages per week, my 
interest is to have a process that is fast for me and does not depend
on having to look at who the maintainer is.

It is fine for me when a maintainer then picks the changes from my NMU 
and does a maintainer upload instead, and the maintainer process might
use the Salsa CI - but that's not something I want to worry about.

Only debian/ or complete sources?
debian/patches/ or patches applied?
One git repository per package, or 1k packages in one git repository?
CI enabled or not?
And the contents of a git tag does sometimes not match the contents
of the package in the archive.

I want to stay out of this mess when fixing bugs.

> Salsa CI would
> have told you about this problem.  Alternatively uploading via Debusine
> would have run the autopkgtest as well.

I do check updates_excuses, which gives me the results of the
Britney CI after the upload.

Doing a second NMU in exceptional cases where it is necessary is far 
less work for me than monitoring the results of two CIs.

> In any case I'd like to repeat that your effort is really welcome
>    Andreas.
>...

cu
Adrian



More information about the Debian-med-packaging mailing list