[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1075270: RFS: mia/2.4.7-14 [RC]
Yavor Doganov
yavor at gnu.org
Tue Oct 21 17:59:14 BST 2025
Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Unfortunately the autopkgtest in my local pbuilder I get:
Just out of curiosity, how do you run autopkgtests in pbuilder? I
couldn't find any documentation about it.
> However, some tests are failing for i386. I decided to remove the
> package from all 32bit architectures to reduce the maintenance burden.
> I'm fine if someone might have a better idea to solve this problem.
I think this is way too drastic and such approach should be used as a
last resort (ideally coordinated with upstream as well). Only 2 test
files out of 310 fail which indicates that the package is far from
broken on i386 (cmdlineparseroutput is flaky and should be always
disabled). I suggest to skip 2dimage-cost-lsd and 3d-vectorfield
tests on 32-bit architectures for the time being, at least until
someone with better C++ knowledge investigates the real culprit.
> We also need to deactivate dh_auto_test for architecture=all builds
> (which I did not do yet).
Right; I'll do this. I'll also remove the SALSA_BUILD stuff as
apparently it's not needed.
> As you can see here
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/mia/-/pipelines/959946
>
> some work is left. The i386 build should have vanished (see above) but
> we need to deal with the other issues (probably ignoring reprotest is
> fine).
The autopkgtest and reprotest tests failed due to a libtool bug
(#1118477) which has been fixed in the meantime.
The piuparts test fails for me locally too because the binary packages
in the archive (from -13) are not installable (they depend on old
library packages that are no longer available). I think (but I'm not
sure) that when britney schedules this test, the inevitable failure
will not be a blocker for the migration of the package to testing.
More information about the Debian-med-packaging
mailing list