[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1130465: Bug#1134597: Please hint orthanc/1.12.11+dfsg-3 migration (force-badtest orthanc-wsi/3.3+dfsg-2)

[Paul Gevers]

Hi,

On 4/23/26 10:50, Sébastien Jodogne wrote:
> Thanks for the followup! The minimal dependency on boost was added as an 
> attempt on my side to fix the following issue:
> 
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1130465


Heh, I recognize that bug report. I think I failed to reply to your last 
message there.

> Unfortunately, as indicated in the discussion above, I am unable to 
> understand what should be done to fix the issue. Anyway, my commit 
> (which was introduced in orthanc_1.12.10+dfsg-2) can most probably be 
> reverted, as it visibly doesn't help:


Unfortunately I can't really tell you what the exact solution should be 
because I don't know how boost and orthanc work together. To avoid 
breakage the expectations of orthanc on boost should be reflected in the 
Depends. Maybe people better in figuring out library relations can jump 
in? To avoid the issue in bug 1130465 I think a reasonable upper limit 
is needed, to avoid the migration issue you're having now, you need a 
better lower limit. How to pick/generate that, I don't know.

Paul

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 585 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20260423/68fede1d/attachment.sig>