[Debian-med-packaging] Please help building psychtoolbox-3 on loongarch
Santiago Vila
sanvila at debian.org
Wed Jun 3 14:47:51 BST 2026
On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 03:07:54PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I just see two options:
>
> 1. Live with one of the two solitions (remove -lLexActivator or the
> minimal patch from Santiago) or
> 2. Do not provide the package for loong64 (which probably causes no
> harm in practice)
I see a third option:
3. Check if the program is really DFSG-free when built on amd64 or arm64.
There is a macro called PSYCH_NOLM, where LM stands for "License Management",
and I see it used like this in PsychSourceGL/Source/Linux/Base/PsychPlatform.h:
#if !defined(__aarch64__) && !defined(__x86_64__)
#define PSYCH_NOLM
Maybe a fully DFSG-compliant package, one which does not have to be
moved to contrib, would need this macro to be always defined.
But I don't know the package to tell.
Thanks.
More information about the Debian-med-packaging
mailing list