[Debian-med-packaging] Please help building psychtoolbox-3 on loongarch

Santiago Vila sanvila at debian.org
Wed Jun 3 14:47:51 BST 2026


On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 03:07:54PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:

> I just see two options:
> 
>    1. Live with one of the two solitions (remove -lLexActivator or the
>       minimal patch from Santiago) or
>    2. Do not provide the package for loong64 (which probably causes no
>       harm in practice)

I see a third option:

3. Check if the program is really DFSG-free when built on amd64 or arm64.

There is a macro called PSYCH_NOLM, where LM stands for "License Management",
and I see it used like this in PsychSourceGL/Source/Linux/Base/PsychPlatform.h:


#if !defined(__aarch64__) && !defined(__x86_64__)
#define PSYCH_NOLM


Maybe a fully DFSG-compliant package, one which does not have to be
moved to contrib, would need this macro to be always defined.

But I don't know the package to tell.

Thanks.



More information about the Debian-med-packaging mailing list