[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1149870: med-laboratory: recommends opencfu which is not in unstable

[Carles Pina i Estany]

Subject: med-laboratory: recommends opencfu which is not in unstable
Package: med-laboratory
Version: 3.9.0
Usertags: package-relations package-relations-recommends
Severity: wishlist

Dear maintainer(s),

I noticed that package med-laboratory recommends opencfu, which is
currently not available in unstable.

See:

- https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/opencfu

It was removed in December 2025 from testing. But it's not in unstable
either. It had some dependencies (gtk-2) that are not packaged in Debian
(unmaintained by upstream); and opencfu upstream's last release was in
2013 so I assume that it's not coming back.

Would it make sense to remove or update it?

Thank you for your time,

PS[0]: I am developing a tool to detect such issues:
https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations . Reports are
manually reviewed before submission. If you would prefer not to receive
such reports (for specific packages, all of your maintained packages,
etc.), please let me know. Any other feedback is welcomed as well. No
more bugreports for this missing relation will be sent.

PS[1]: more information available in
https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations/-/blob/main/README.md
and
https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations/-/blob/main/docs/bug-report-extra-info.md

-- 
Carles Pina i Estany
https://carles.pina.cat | carles at pina.cat | cpina at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20261003/44ea5904/attachment.sig>