<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div>Hi,<br><br></div>EDFbrowser compiles fine with both Qt 5.6.1 that comes with Opensuse Leap 42.2 as well<br></div>with the latest Qt 5.9.1 compiled from the official Qt vanilla source.<br><br></div>Some serious bugs are present in Qt 5, specially in the Qt 5.6.x series.<br>Qt 5.9.1 seems to be better but still not as good as Qt 4.8.7.<br><br></div>Qt5 is a "non-blocking" framework, it's released with lots of blocking P0 and P1 bugs:<br><br><a href="https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-61717?filter=18388&jql=project%20%3D%20QTBUG%20AND%20priority%20in%20(%22P0%3A%20Blocker%22%2C%20%22P1%3A%20Critical%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20affectedVersion%20in%20(releasedVersions()%2C%205.9.1)%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC" target="_blank">https://bugreports.qt.io/<wbr>browse/QTBUG-61717?filter=<wbr>18388&jql=project%20%3D%<wbr>20QTBUG%20AND%20priority%20in%<wbr>20(%22P0%3A%20Blocker%22%2C%<wbr>20%22P1%3A%20Critical%22)%<wbr>20AND%20resolution%20%3D%<wbr>20Unresolved%20AND%<wbr>20affectedVersion%20in%20(<wbr>releasedVersions()%2C%205.9.1)<wbr>%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC</a><br><br><a href="http://blog.qt.io/blog/2017/05/31/qt-5-9-released/" target="_blank">http://blog.qt.io/blog/2017/<wbr>05/31/qt-5-9-released/</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>Have you seen any compile errors with EDFbrowser & Qt5 on Debian?</div><div>Let me know if there are any issues.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Kind Regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Teunis</div><div><br></div><div><br><br><div><div><div><br></div></div></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Andreas Tille <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tille@debian.org" target="_blank">tille@debian.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">control: forwarded -1 <a href="https://github.com/Teuniz/EDFbrowser/issues/30" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/Teuniz/<wbr>EDFbrowser/issues/30</a><br>
control: tags -1 upstream<br>
<br>
Hi Teunis,<br>
<br>
I added some comment to Github issue 30 about Qt5 migration.  It would be<br>
great if you could put some emphasis on it.<br>
<br>
Kind regards<br>
<br>
       Andreas.<br>
<br>
On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 09:03:58PM +0200, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:<br>
> Source: edfbrowser<br>
> Version: 1.58-1<br>
> Severity: wishlist<br>
> User: <a href="mailto:debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org">debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org</a><br>
> Usertags: qt4-removal<br>
><br>
><br>
> Hi! As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4<br>
> as [announced] in:<br>
><br>
> [announced] <<a href="https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2017/08/msg00006.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.debian.org/<wbr>debian-devel-announce/2017/08/<wbr>msg00006.html</a>><br>
><br>
> Currently Qt4 has been dead upstream and we are starting to have problems<br>
> maintaining it, like for example in the [OpenSSL 1.1 support] case.<br>
><br>
> [OpenSSL 1.1 support] <<a href="https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828522" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-<wbr>bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828522</a>><br>
><br>
> In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on<br>
> the Qt4 libraries have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get<br>
> removed from the Debian repositories.<br>
><br>
> Therefore, please take the time and:<br>
> - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5<br>
> port of your application<br>
> - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are<br>
> suitable alternatives for your users<br>
> - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it<br>
> - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian<br>
> archives, consider removing the Qt4 version<br>
><br>
> = Porting =<br>
><br>
> Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we<br>
> know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less<br>
> painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4.<br>
><br>
> We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4.<br>
><br>
> Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever<br>
> you start porting your application.<br>
><br>
> [migration] <a href="http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtbasedstuff.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.<wbr>org/packagingqtbasedstuff.html</a><br>
> [apichanges] <a href="http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/<wbr>sourcebreaks.html</a><br>
><br>
> For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE<br>
> team at <a href="mailto:debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org">debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org</a><br>
><br>
> The removal is being tracked in <<a href="https://wiki.debian.org/Qt4Removal" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.debian.org/<wbr>Qt4Removal</a>><br>
><br>
> Lisandro,<br>
> on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers<br>
><br>
> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
> Debian-med-packaging mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Debian-med-packaging@lists.alioth.debian.org">Debian-med-packaging@lists.<wbr>alioth.debian.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.alioth.debian.<wbr>org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/<wbr>debian-med-packaging</a><br>
><br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
<a href="http://fam-tille.de" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://fam-tille.de</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">"C'è qualcosa nella nebbia! Qualcosa nella nebbia ha preso John Lee!"</div>
</div>