[Debian-pan-maintainers] mrcfile testsuite datasets license?

[Roland Mas]

Thank you, that's great. I just uploaded mrcfile 1.4.3 to the Debian new 
package queue.

A minor suggestion: maybe tests/test_data should only contain the *.bz2 
files to save disk space and bandwidth, and they could be uncompressed 
and re-compressed to gzip by the test script itself, rather than having 
three versions of all the big files.

Cheers,

Roland.

Le 21/09/2022 à 18:37, Colin Palmer - STFC UKRI a écrit :
> Hi Roland,
>
> I've updated the readme to add attribution for the test files: https://github.com/ccpem/mrcfile/blob/master/tests/test_data/README.txt
>
> I plan to make a new release of mrcfile soon that will include the updated readme.
>
> I hope that takes care of everything you need, but do let me know if I can help with anything else.
>
> Best wishes,
> Colin
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roland Mas <lolando at debian.org>
> Sent: 20 September 2022 16:55
> To: Palmer, Colin (STFC,RAL,SC) <colin.palmer at stfc.ac.uk>
> Cc: debian-pan-maintainers at alioth-lists.debian.net
> Subject: Re: mrcfile testsuite datasets license?
>
> Updating the readme would be great, thanks.
>
> In the meantime I found a statement in the EMDB FAQ that "Data files contained in the EMDB are free of all copyright restrictions and made fully and freely available for both non-commercial and commercial use", so that's fine. As for the other files, I will take your word as a maintainer that they're implicitly BSD-licensed. Some attribution would be nice though, if you could trace their author.
>
> Thanks for your answer! I may get in touch with you later on, if Debian users report bugs or suggest improvements :-)
>
> Roland.
>
> Le 20/09/2022 à 15:31, Colin Palmer - STFC UKRI a écrit :
>> Hi Roland,
>>
>> Thanks for pointing out that the licence for some of the test datasets is not clear. I will update the readme file.
>>
>> I'm not familiar with the Debian guidelines - are the files from EMDB acceptable as they are, or do you need more specific information about their licensing?
>>
>> The other test files were contributed by people who agreed for me to share them publicly. There was no specific discussion of licensing, but since the files were contributed to a BSD-licensed project I've assumed that they implicitly agreed for the files to be distributed under the same licence as the code.
>>
>> Most of the tests for mrcfile do not need any test data files, so if it's not possible to resolve the licensing situation to Debian's satisfaction, I could add a switch to allow a subset of the tests to be run without the test datasets present.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Colin
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Roland Mas <lolando at debian.org>
>> Sent: 20 September 2022 13:57
>> To: Palmer, Colin (STFC,RAL,SC) <colin.palmer at stfc.ac.uk>
>> Cc: debian-pan-maintainers at alioth-lists.debian.net
>> Subject: mrcfile testsuite datasets license?
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm Roland Mas, a Debian developer and freelance consultant. I'm tasked by Synchrotron SOLEIL with packaging mrcfile for Debian. Part of that job is ensuring that mrcfile complies with the Debian free software guidelines (DFSG).
>>
>>    From what I can see, the code of mrcfile itself is fine (the BSD-3-clause license is quite okay), that's a good start.
>>
>> However, the testsuite includes a few datasets for testing the code itself, and the license for these datasets is not quite clear.
>> mrcfile/tests/test_data/README.txt credits the source of two of the datasets to EMDB; the "policies" page on the EMDB website states that the submitter of datasets must ensure that the authors "Agree to public distribution of all entry data without restriction", but I can't find a trace of the actual licensing of the datasets when distributed by EMDB.
>>
>> As for the mrcfile/tests/test_data/*.mrc* files, I can't find any licensing information at all.
>>
>> Could you point me at licensing information that I could rely on to be able to include mrcfile as is into Debian? I could of course remove the datasets from the package that I push to Debian, but then I couldn't automatically run the testsuite, and that would be a pity (even though it probably wouldn't impact the functionality of the package).
>>
>> Thanks in advance for any pointers or information,
>>
>> (And thanks for mrcfile, even though it's far from my field of
>> expertise :-)
>>
>> Roland Mas.
>>
>>
>> This email and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the named recipients. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or distribute this email or any of its attachments and should notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your system. UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise risk of this email or any attachments containing viruses or malware but the recipient should carry out its own virus and malware checks before opening the attachments. UKRI does not accept any liability for any losses or damages which the recipient may sustain due to presence of any viruses.