From rt at rt.debian.org Wed Apr 16 19:21:20 2025 From: rt at rt.debian.org (Philipp Kern via RT) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 18:21:20 +0000 Subject: [Debian-rtc-admin] [rt.debian.org #8880] Set a CNAME record in debian.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Do we know why the existing _xmpp-server._tcp.conference.debian.org entry is not sufficient? Per my understanding and https://prosody.im/doc/dns it should be. We also have _xmpp-client._tcp.conference.debian.org in there, which I think should be removed. I'd be reluctant to add a CNAME for conference if we can avoid it. From rt at rt.debian.org Wed Apr 16 19:45:38 2025 From: rt at rt.debian.org (DD Role Account via RT) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 18:45:38 +0000 Subject: [Debian-rtc-admin] [rt.debian.org #8880] Set a CNAME record in debian.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed Apr 16 18:21:20 2025, pkern wrote: > Do we know why the existing _xmpp-server._tcp.conference.debian.org > entry is not sufficient? Per my understanding and > https://prosody.im/doc/dns it should be. We also have _xmpp- > client._tcp.conference.debian.org in there, which I think should be > removed. I'd be reluctant to add a CNAME for conference if we can > avoid it. Neither the _xmpp-client._tcp.conference.debian.org nor the CNAME should be necessary, AFAIK. From rt at rt.debian.org Wed Apr 16 20:44:50 2025 From: rt at rt.debian.org (Philipp Kern via RT) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 19:44:50 +0000 Subject: [Debian-rtc-admin] [rt.debian.org #8880] Set a CNAME record in debian.org In-Reply-To: <3ab7c97b-05ce-488e-9cb4-41749e0b717d@debian.org> References: <3ab7c97b-05ce-488e-9cb4-41749e0b717d@debian.org> Message-ID: On 4/16/25 8:45 PM, DD Role Account via RT wrote: > > > On Wed Apr 16 18:21:20 2025, pkern wrote: >> Do we know why the existing _xmpp-server._tcp.conference.debian.org >> entry is not sufficient? Per my understanding and >> https://prosody.im/doc/dns it should be. We also have _xmpp- >> client._tcp.conference.debian.org in there, which I think should be >> removed. I'd be reluctant to add a CNAME for conference if we can >> avoid it. > > Neither the _xmpp-client._tcp.conference.debian.org nor the CNAME should be necessary, AFAIK. Who sent this last message? FWIW, we are considering locking down the "debian" account to read-only because we keep getting unattributed replies. Optimally we'd have an alternative way of signing up for RT (e.g. through Salsa) before that but alas. So, if using the "debian" role account, please sign your mails with a name. Thanks! Kind regards Philipp Kern From rt at rt.debian.org Wed Apr 16 21:44:31 2025 From: rt at rt.debian.org (DD Role Account via RT) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 20:44:31 +0000 Subject: [Debian-rtc-admin] [rt.debian.org #8880] Set a CNAME record in debian.org In-Reply-To: References: <3ab7c97b-05ce-488e-9cb4-41749e0b717d@debian.org> Message-ID: On Wed Apr 16 19:44:50 2025, pkern wrote: > Who sent this last message? That was me, Martin . Sorry for the confusion!