[Debian-salsa-ci] DEP18 follow-up: What would be the best path to have all top-150 packages use Salsa CI?
Ahmed Siam
aahs.coder at gmail.com
Sat Aug 24 00:00:18 BST 2024
On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 1:45 AM Ahmed Siam <aahs.coder at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 1:25 AM Jérémy Lal <kapouer at melix.org> wrote:
> > A bunch of packages I know (nodejs, receptor to name a few) have salsa CI failures, but no sbuild failures.
> > It would be perfect if the build process was exactly the same.
>
> There is a work-in-progress MRs about using sbuild for building packages.
>
> When I tried to run salsaci on the perl package, It failed at the first job.
> Maybe the bug that causes failure of the pipeline on nodejs is similar.
> I will try to figure out the cause and fix it.
Actually, it isn't the same error.
It seems that nodejs fails to build because of runner timeout.
I think this error won't be solved even after switching to sbuild.
Nodejs package needs more powerful runners and/or larger timeout value.
Nodejs pipeline run: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/nodejs/-/pipelines/681481
-- Ahmed Siam
More information about the Debian-salsa-ci
mailing list