Comments regarding mpi-defaults_0.2_amd64.changes
Adam C Powell IV
hazelsct at debian.org
Fri Dec 26 06:48:49 UTC 2008
On Thu, 2008-12-25 at 17:03 +0000, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> mpi-default-bin is section "libdevel" in your package.
> The packages it depends on have either "net" or "utils".
> I really think we should think about deciding on one for
> all of these...
Good point! -dev should be libdevel, but -bin should be net or utils.
Filed a minor bug.
I'm also filing a few wishlist bugs against packages to use this instead
of mpich, lam and openmpi. I think it might make sense to let people
test it a bit before another upload.
Thanks,
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20081226/894cd22d/attachment.pgp
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list