Usertagging rules

[Manuel Prinz]

Am Freitag, den 19.09.2008, 15:51 +0200 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
> > 1. What to do with closed ITPs? I do not see any point in having them
> > tagged, so I propose to remove all usertags when they hit the archive.
> > Currently, we have ITPs tracked that are closed either because the
> > package is available in Debian or noone cared to make a package.
> > Removing those who are in the archive would make the other packages more
> > visible. On the other hand, we could introduce a new usertag for
> > seperating them. I have a script to detect the ITP bugs that where
> > closed when the package hit the archive, so removing their usertags can
> > be automated in the future. This would allow us to see just the
> > "work-needing but closed" ITPs.
> Yep, obviously, we should remove them.

Done already.

> > 2. Changing to "field..x": Some (old) bug have usertags such as
> > "biology", whereas "field..biology" seems to be the recently used term.
> > While changing those to their "field" correspondent, I saw that all of
> > them where archived. I'd like to change those but am not sure if the
> > "field" notation is the consensus.
> I am ok with this notation ...
> It is the one used in the wiki:
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience

That was my reasoning: Being consistent with the current notation. I
already changed those too.

> While we are talking about tags, for example, on this page: 
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=field..biology;users=debian-science@lists.debian.org
> I can see all the packages tagged field..biology but I don't see any
> reference in the ITP itself (ex:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=378290 
> ), it is normal ?

This is normal. Usertags do not appear on bug report pages.

Best regards
Manuel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20081001/ee0692f9/attachment.pgp