artha_0.8.0-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Andreas Tille tillea at
Sat Mar 28 22:49:49 UTC 2009

On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Joerg Jaspert wrote:

> rejected, why this got sponsored in the first place is beyond me, your
> sponsor must have been dreaming...

Ups - yes.  I could have sworn it was lintian clean.  Sorry for
overlooking this.

> Please *DO* *NOT* hardcode the
> dependencies for your package. That is a very bad idea.
> Using lintian would have told you so, at the minimum for libc6, but this
> is true for all of your dependencies besides wordnet.

This issue will be fixes soon.

Sorry for bothering you with such stupid issues



More information about the debian-science-maintainers mailing list