Bug#555707: Please provide an additional package

[Dmitry E. Oboukhov]

AT> I surely agree if it makes sense.

>> goldendict can use dict-wn package, but dict-wn look worse than
>> wordnet-goldendict, because this script was specially written to get
>> the nicest form.

AT> Ahh, OK.  Perhaps it might make sense to verify how wordnet-goldendict
AT> might look in text interface.  It might make sense to give a nicely
AT> formatted UI preference and live with the not so beautiful but prefectly
AT> readable console output.

unfortunately console dict doesn't work with this format of
dictionary, do You know another console tool?

>> dict-wn CAN be used, but wordnet-goldendict has more nice form.
>> Compare screenshots in attache:
>> 
>>     ss-dict-wn.png and ss-wordnet-goldendict.png
>> 
>> the first is oriented to use in terminal, the second is oriented to
>> use in GUI.

AT> The screenshots are enlighting, thanks.  How does a dict terminal would
AT> look like with wordnet-goldendict?
I don't know. I didn't manage to try console utilitie, because i
haven't found such util which can understabd dsl format. :(

AT> I'm actually a bit concerned about #549768 which might result in some
AT> more complete rebuilds.  BTW, on which architecture did you builded the
AT> package.  Did you aboserved any problem.

No, I've built and rebuilt package a few times, without any problems.

AT> According to the timing.  I will have only 128kBit upload which
AT> frequently breaks upload of larger packages like WordNet.  So I
AT> can not upload your patch before Monday.  Please ping me if you
AT> did not heard anything from me until Wednesday next week.

Oh, Don't be hurry. It is enough for me to have knowledge that You
agreed my patch :)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20091111/33d6ac7b/attachment-0001.pgp>