Bug#567814: Still happening
Dominique Belhachemi
domibel at cs.tu-berlin.de
Thu Jun 3 18:25:13 UTC 2010
Hi Michael,
thanks for the detailed information. It helps to figure out what is
going wrong.
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 08:52 -0400, Michael Hanke wrote:
> My system's current state is compliant with this:
>
> michael at meiner ~ % apt-cache policy vtk-tcl
> vtk-tcl:
> Installed: 5.2.1-11
> Candidate: 5.4.2-7
> Version table:
> 5.4.2-7 0
> 500 http://debian.lcs.mit.edu sid/main Packages
> 5.4.2-6 0
> 500 http://debian.lcs.mit.edu squeeze/main Packages
> *** 5.2.1-11 0
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> 5.0.4-1.1 0
> 500 http://debian.lcs.mit.edu lenny/main Packages
>
The current version of vtk-tcl for testing is 5.4.2-6 .
You are using an old version of this package. Is there a reason why you
stick with the old version 5.2.1-11?
> Slicer should probably make use of a versioned dependency on vtk-tcl.
Yes, that is one of the reason why I kept this bug report open.
The other thing I was thinking about is to change the name of vtk-tcl
according to the Debian Tcl/Tk policy [0] to tcl8.5-vtk .
Cheers
Dominique
[0]
http://pkg-tcltk.alioth.debian.org/tcltk-policy.html/ch-module_packages.html#s-dependencies
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list