No subject

unsupported. But I think that we can submit those patches and see
if their politics change for a next release.

>> Hopefully an alternative way of using
>> HDF5 may be provided as suggested by Sylvestre:
>>     http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D576004

> Thanks.  Unfortunately, the HDF5 group tends to take a long time to
> respond to such requests (often many months, even when a patch is
> available), so we shouldn't count on this to happen before our next
> upload.
I have to confess that I had better hope on that point.

...
>> In conclusion what could be the organization for welcoming the future
>> Salome 5.1.4 release? Should it be progressively ported on a separate
>> branch by using the up-to-date sources [2]? Or would you prefer a one-=
shot
>> transition from 5.1.3?

> If upstream is not going to accept patches before 5.1.4, then I think
> the one-shot transition makes the most sense.  But I appreciate your
> examination of the upstream git repository to determine in advance what
> changes we will need to make in order to port our patches to 5.1.4.
Ok, it sounds fine to me. I am going to be unavailable until the end of
August, then I can try the 5.1.4 transition at the beginning of September
if needed.
By the way, the 5.1.4 Salome version is now available at:
    http://www.salome-platform.org/downloads/salome-v5.1.4

All the best,

Andr=E9