GetFem++ 4.1.1

[Konstantinos Poulios]

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:33 AM, Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre at debian.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 14:47 +0100, Konstantinos Poulios wrote:
>> bump
> I commited my changes on the package. In particular the Scilab package.
> If it is OK with you, I would like to upload it to experimental until
> Squeeze is out.
>
ok, sounds logical.

>> btw, should we add the dependencies which are necessary for the
>> package libgetfem++-dev to be fully functional as mentioned in bug
>> 596916?
> If they are mandatory for getfem++, yes but I am not sure it is really
> the case.
AFAIK there are certain parts of libgetfem++-dev which will not be
usable without libmuparser-dev. The same is true for libgmm++-dev
which would depend on libsuperlu3-dev and libmumps-seq-dev in order to
be fully functional. Though, both libgetfem++-dev and libgmm++-dev
will handle the case of any of the above mentioned dependencies
missing, with corresponding error/warning messages. Actually, my
question would be, what is the debian policy about dev packages? Their
packaging dependencies should ensure a minimum functionality or a full
functionality?

> I don't know if conditional are possible with pkg-config ?!
>
> Sylvestre
>

Kostas