Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')
Julien Cristau
julien.cristau at logilab.fr
Fri Dec 16 08:57:23 UTC 2011
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 19:45:47 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Found the problem. PETSc built on November 16 with mpi-defaults 0.6
> which depended on LAM on non-openmpi arches. Now mpi-defaults 1.0.1
> released 12/4 depends on MPICH2, so we have a mix of architectures
> installed. And mpi-defaults just went into testing today... Crap!
>
> It may be that other PETSc dependencies need rebuilding too... and there
> are a lot of them! Let's see: suitesparse, spooles, hypre, scotch,
> blacs-mpi, scalapack, mumps, all have to be rebuilt with MPICH2! What
> was built when:
> * suitesparse: April 15 2010
> * spooles: May 11 2010
> * hypre: August 15 2010
> * scotch: April 6 2011
> * blacs-mpi: August 29 2011
> * scalapack: September 18 2011
> * mumps: March 31 2011
> None was built recently, all need to be rebuilt. mpi-defaults should
> not be in testing until at least these are rebuilt, probably others.
>
> Note: HDF5 is not a problem for PETSc because PETSc only links to it on
> OpenMPI platforms. I forgot why that is, maybe it's worth a try
> building PETSc against HDF5-mpich2? Maybe later...
>
> Okay, cloning this bug to a bunch of packages, see above. I've been an
> uploader to all except blacs-mpi and scalapack, and many of them could
> use some maintenance, this is a good excuse to spend time on them. :-)
>
If any of those can be fixed with a no-change rebuild on the buildds,
rather than a source upload, let debian-release know, and we'll schedule
them.
Thanks,
Julien
--
Julien Cristau <julien.cristau at logilab.fr>
Logilab http://www.logilab.fr/
Informatique scientifique & gestion de connaissances
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list