Bug#651997: python-dolfin: unknown symbol: wrapper_dgesv_
Kumar Appaiah
akumar at debian.org
Tue Dec 20 16:12:31 UTC 2011
I am CCing upstream here.
Dear Conrad,
Was an shlib bump warranted, based on your view of
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651997 ?
Thanks.
Kumar
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:35:53AM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
> [Adding Kumar (maintainer of Armadillo) in Cc]
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Julien Cristau
> <julien.cristau at logilab.fr> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:46:46 +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Andreas Kloeckner <inform at tiker.net> wrote:
> >> > This being as it is, could you upload a new package with tightened
> >> > dependencies?
> >>
> >> The dependency on libarmadillo2 is added automatically by
> >> ${shlibs:Depends}. I guess I could add a version requirement for
> >> libarmadillo-dev in Build-Depends, but DOLFIN does not depend on a
> >> specific version of Armadillo, so I don't see why I should. You had
> >> this problem because you were using an old libarmadillo2 (version
> >> 1:2.2.5+dfsg-1) from testing while you using DOLFIN (version 1.0.0-1)
> >> from unstable, which was built against a newer libarmadillo2 package
> >> from unstable. I guess this is a problem you will see from time to
> >> time when mixing packages from testing and unstable.
> >>
> > No, it absolutely isn't. If libarmadillo2 exports new symbols then it
> > has to bump the version in its shlibs declaration. If it didn't do
> > that, this is a serious bug in that package.
>
> Yes, you are absolutely right. What I wrote above wasn't thought through.
>
> Johannes
--
Kumar Appaiah
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list