Bug#616736: opencascade: please update to 6.5.0

[Adam C Powell IV]

On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 16:51 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le mardi 22 mars 2011 à 11:43 -0400, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
> > On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 16:34 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > > Le mardi 22 mars 2011 à 11:22 -0400, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
> > > > On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 12:09 +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > > > > On 2011/3/21 Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 07:01 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > > > > >> On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 16:21 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > > > > >> > I can build and upload on Monday, but I'm afraid I don't have time until
> > > > > >> > then.  Sylvestre, if you can do it before Monday, then feel free to go
> > > > > >> > ahead.  Otherwise I will post to the bug again when I start to build.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Just finished the build and am about to dupload.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The finished package will be at http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/opencascade/
> > > > > >> (along with a bunch of old versions).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > D'oh!  Forgot to change from UNRELEASED to unstable.  Building again...
> > > > > 
> > > > > Please upload to experimental. AFAICT one has to ask debian-release
> > > > > before uploading a new library, can someone confirm?
> > > > 
> > > > I haven't heard this, and don't remember seeing anything in d-d-a on
> > > > this.  The NEW queue has, in the past day, entries for libav and
> > > > libboost with new library versions in unstable, and libunique3 and hdf5
> > > > with new library versions in experimental (hdf5 changed by Sylvestre).
> > > Well, about hdf5, I contacted the release team but haven't heard back.
> > > Anyway, experimental is for such things...
> > 
> > Really?  When was the announcement?  In the past, I've always uploaded
> > new libraries into unstable, and they entered when they've passed
> > through the NEW queue...
> To me, when the binary compatibility of a library changes, you are supposed to apply the 
> following procedure:
> 
> http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html#binarycompat

Thanks, I hadn't seen that document.  I don't see anything there on
unstable vs. experimental though.

[Also my last post only mentioned freecad, netgen and elmerfem; I didn't
note that gmsh and salome are also reverse-depends of opencascade.]

> > I don't see a post from you in the debian-release archives from this
> > year (2011).  When did you contact them?
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/02/msg00503.html

Oh, my mistake.  (I only looked at the first page of each month.)  I
notice that there weren't any followups.

I have to say I am glad you are working with hdf5 -- that team was the
slowest I have ever seen to process new patches etc.!

> I uploaded to experimental to make sure it build correctly (which is not
> the case here). After this is fixed, I will have to upload to unstable
> and report bugs to the reverse dependencies of hdf5 asking them to
> update the dependencies...

I see, so you're using experimental to test building.  As you said I
don't think that's an issue here, so I think I can upload it to
unstable, haven't heard anything to convince me otherwise...

The updated packages are at http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/opencascade/

-Adam
-- 
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20110322/3298c3f0/attachment.pgp>