Bug#660607: marked as done (liblapack3: postinst fails on upgrade ("error: alternative liblapack.so.3gf can't be slave of liblapack.so.3"))

Tue Apr 10 20:57:06 UTC 2012

Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:54:41 +0000
with message-id <E1SHi5J-0003uF-Th at franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#660607: fixed in lapack 3.4.0-1~exp3
has caused the Debian Bug report #660607,
regarding liblapack3: postinst fails on upgrade ("error: alternative liblapack.so.3gf can't be slave of liblapack.so.3")
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

-- 
660607: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660607
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder at gmail.com>
Subject: liblapack3: postinst fails on upgrade ("error: alternative liblapack.so.3gf can't be slave of liblapack.so.3")
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 00:38:29 -0600
Size: 4586
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20120410/af9b64cb/attachment-0002.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre at debian.org>
Subject: Bug#660607: fixed in lapack 3.4.0-1~exp3
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:54:41 +0000
Size: 8310
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20120410/af9b64cb/attachment-0003.mht>