Bug#696274: Why the **** does it suggest python3-svipc?
Jürgen A. Erhard
jae+debian at jaerhard.com
Tue Dec 18 21:46:07 UTC 2012
Package: python-svipc
Version: 0.14-2
Severity: normal
No further comment necessary.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages python-svipc depends on:
ii libc6 2.13-37
ii python 2.7.3-3
ii python-numpy [python-numpy-abi9] 1:1.6.2-1
python-svipc recommends no packages.
Versions of packages python-svipc suggests:
pn python3-svipc <none>
pn yorick-svipc <none>
-- no debconf information
-- debsums errors found:
dpkg-query: warning: parsing file '/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 58866 package 'python-jae':
error in Version string 'r89': version number does not start with digit
dpkg-divert: warning: parsing file '/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 58866 package 'python-jae':
error in Version string 'r89': version number does not start with digit
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list