ongoing slepc/petsc transition
Adam C Powell IV
hazelsct at debian.org
Thu Jan 26 13:52:10 UTC 2012
On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 00:51 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct at debian.org> (23/01/2012):
> > deal.II detects the PETSc version and acts accordingly, I believe 7.1.0
> > will work through 3.2. I need to work on upgrading from 7.0.0 to 7.1.0.
>
> […]
>
> > Illuminator has major problems -- the PETSc object on which all of
> > illuminator is based has changed drastically. This will require major
> > upstream surgery, and the new version will not be data-compatible with
> > the old.
> >
> > Since upstream is me, I can tell you I will not have time for the
> > foreseeable future (couple of months at least) to port illuminator to
> > PETSc 3.2. It will need to come out of testing when PETSc
> > transitions. :-(
>
> […]
>
> > Can't speak for the others (dolfin, feel++, gmsh).
>
> That means one “OK-able” package, one “oops-broken-for-a-long-while”
> package, and several “unknown-status” packages. To keep everyone as
> testing candidates until this transition is ready, maybe re-uploading
> petsc 3.1 would do the trick? (Either with an epoch or with the
> 3.2-is-really-3.1-like dirty version.) This way, all packages can stay
> in testing and be updated through unstable w/o having to be entangled?
I think we're closer than that, we've been active for the past couple of
weeks to make this happen. The only unknown at this point is feel++.
Stuff to do looks like:
* Upload a new petsc to fix some bugs (me, probably today)
* Upload a new slepc with a tiny patch to add a header file (me,
probably today)
* Upload mpich2 from alioth to fix an RC bug (me, today or
tomorrow)
* Update to deal.II 7.1.0 (me, within a week)
* Patch gmsh to work with petsc/slepc 3.2 (Christophe Trophime
with my help, probably within a week)
* Update DOLFIN (Johannes Ring, within a week)
* Test/update feel++ (?? If nobody else I'll take a stab at it)
* Remove illuminator from testing (release team)
* Close the RC bug against mpi-defaults (which is pointless anyway
because it transitioned just before I filed it, I'll do this
today)
It looks like there's a clear path to success, and this can all happen
within a week or two, then we can transition a bunch of stuff at once
including HDF5. Otherwise we're stuck trying to do two transitions
which will take at least 4 weeks...
Makes sense?
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20120126/8b80b9c1/attachment.pgp>
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list