Bug#676657: marked as done ([libatlas3gf-base] update-alternatives doesn't provide libblas.so.3gf)
Debian Bug Tracking System
owner at bugs.debian.org
Sat Jun 9 16:36:21 UTC 2012
Your message dated Sat, 09 Jun 2012 18:34:31 +0200
with message-id <4FD37B17.1070505 at debian.org>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #676657,
regarding [libatlas3gf-base] update-alternatives doesn't provide libblas.so.3gf
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
676657: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676657
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: darkestkhan <darkestkhan at gmail.com>
Subject: [libatlas3gf-base] update-alternatives doesn't provide libblas.so.3gf
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:31:10 +0000
Size: 17985
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20120609/d16b3bae/attachment-0002.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre at debian.org>
Subject: no subject
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 18:34:31 +0200
Size: 2260
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20120609/d16b3bae/attachment-0003.mht>
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list