Comments regarding libfolia_0.10-3_i386.changes

[Joost van Baal-Ilić]

Hi Ansgar,

Thanks for your comments.

On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 08:53:30AM +0000, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> 
> why is the -dev package versioned?

You mean, why isn't libfolia2-dev (0.10-3) named libfolia-dev (0.10-3)?  Hrm, I
believe I've made a mistake and it would indeed better be named libfolia-dev.

Same is true for

 mbt_3.2.10-2_i386.changes       (libmbt1-dev_3.2.10-2)
 timblserver_1.7-2_i386.changes  (libtimblserver2-dev_1.6-3)
 ucto_0.5.3-2_i386.changes       (libucto2-dev_0.5.3-2)

.  I am now preparing new uploads for these, and fixing related Build-Depends.

> Random other notes:
>  - Spelling error in d/changelog: "debian/controol"

Just fixed in SVN.

>  - You shouldn't upload a new source package to get a package rebuild for a
>    specific architecture (see changelog entry for 0.9-2). Ask for a binNMU
>    instead.

A yes, will do so next time.

Bye,

Joost