MPICH update

[Torquil Macdonald Sørensen]

Hi!

I think I have fixed it. The library symbols file was called 
libmpich10.symbols, but should have been called 
libmpich10.symbols.amd64, since it was generated on amd64 and is 
arch-specific. I have renamed it, so AFAIK the build process on 
non-amd64 will now act as if no symbols file exists, and should 
therefore succeed. We can look into adding symbols-files for the other 
architectures at a later date.

Best regards
Torquil Sørensen

On 05/09/13 08:05, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Hi Torquil,
>
> mpich has been accepted last night into the main archive. Unfortunately
> it fails to build almost on all platforms because of undefined symbols.
>
> Could you, please, have a look? I have personally no experience with symbols.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Anton
>
> 2013/8/15 Torquil Macdonald Sørensen <torquil at gmail.com>:
>> Hi Anton!
>>
>>
>> On 10/08/13 23:40, Anton Gladky wrote:
>>> So, generally I am ready to upload the package. I think, it will not be
>>> harmfull, as mpich is even not in testing. We just need probably a
>>> NEWS-file. So when, you are ready with the package, let me know. Thanks for
>>> your work. Anton
>>
>> I've now included the NEWS-file. Feel free to improve the text if you are
>> unhappy with it before uploading the package. I guess it is going to
>> "unstable", so that is what I wrote in both the NEWS-file and changelog
>> headings.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Torquil Sørensen
>>