Bug#695825: marked as done (liblapack-dev: Please depend on libblas.so virtual package instead of nonexistent virtual package libblas-3.so)
Debian Bug Tracking System
owner at bugs.debian.org
Sat Sep 14 21:09:18 UTC 2013
Your message dated Sat, 14 Sep 2013 21:04:33 +0000
with message-id <E1VKx17-0001pe-AP at franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#695825: fixed in lapack 3.4.2+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #695825,
regarding liblapack-dev: Please depend on libblas.so virtual package instead of nonexistent virtual package libblas-3.so
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
695825: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695825
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Ryo IGARASHI <rigarash at gmail.com>
Subject: liblapack-dev: Please depend on libblas.so virtual package instead of nonexistent virtual package libblas-3.so
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:42:54 +0900
Size: 4458
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20130914/e55dc8f7/attachment-0002.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: =?utf-8?q?S=C3=A9bastien_Villemot?= <sebastien at debian.org>
Subject: Bug#695825: fixed in lapack 3.4.2+dfsg-2
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 21:04:33 +0000
Size: 9030
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20130914/e55dc8f7/attachment-0003.mht>
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list