Boost needs help

[Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda]

Perfect,

now ompl compiles.

Thanks Steve


A Dimecres, 12 de març de 2014, Jose Luis Rivero va escriure:
> New boost release version (-5) was uploaded fixing the bug 739904 according
> to the changelog[1].
> 
> [1]
> http://metadata.ftp-
master.debian.org/changelogs//main/b/boost1.54/boost1.54_1.54.0-5_changelog
> 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <leo at alaxarxa.net
> > wrote:
> 
> > A Dimecres, 5 de març de 2014, Steve M. Robbins va escriure:
> > > On March 3, 2014 09:22:01 AM Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> > >
> > > > > [1] https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8731
> > > > > [2] https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/84950
> > > > > [3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739904
> > > > > [4] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482372
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Jose,
> > > >
> > > > so, when the new package of boost were upload, then we can try to 
build
> > > > again and see if it works... I hope so.
> > >
> > > The fix for this bug has been made and uploaded.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, the upload was rejected for unrelated bugs.  Apparently
> > they
> > > are "serious" bugs but not the kind I am not motivated to fix.  So
> > patches
> > for
> > > #735339 and #735353 would be welcome.  Please work against
> > > svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-boost/boost/branches/1.54.0
> > >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I don't know if I'm surprised, thinking if it's Aprils fools or what.
> > Simply I
> > don't understand the situation. Anyway, looking the bugs:
> >
> > 735339:Non free w3m valid icons
> >
> > I think that it could be several solutions. One is repack the source
> > without
> > that file. I don't know how to send a patch for this. It's a NMU. Maybe, 
we
> > can change the icon, but ...
> >
> > If it's just to change the icon, I can borrow the equivalent icons from
> > piuparts and change it.
> >
> > And the last is create a libboost-nonfree with all this stuff.
> >
> >
> > 735353: Sourceless file
> >
> > I have no idea about javascript. Looking the files the are scripts, some
> > firstly I don't understand the bug. However, I imagine that this "strange
> > files" come from some sources, and the file provided is just the exit from
> > another script.
> >
> > I don't know sufficiently the policies but maybe it could be sufficient 
do:
> > or put a note in the README with the two links from where download the
> > sources,
> > or include the two sources in some place of the package.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Leopold
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Linux User 152692
> > Catalonia
> >
> 


-- 
--
Linux User 152692
Catalonia
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20140312/07a8fa2c/attachment.sig>