libccd_1.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Jose Luis Rivero]

aaah .. nevermind, upstream was *fast* and I have a new release with all
the required changes merged :)

https://github.com/danfis/libccd/issues/6#issuecomment-38096711

On 03/19/2014 07:11 PM, Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
> // uncopy Thorsten
> 
> Science group:
> 
> I've written some inline comments about the reasons to reject the
> package. I would need a quick look:
> 
>> On 03/19/2014 05:00 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>>>
> ...
>>>
>>> The files in libccd-1.5\src\testsuites\cu\* are licensed under LGPLv3+. 
>>> Please mention this in debian/copyright.
>>>
> 
> This should be fixed:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/libccd.git;a=commitdiff;h=241230ef1efdb7f81124c903dcaf9e655010a594
> 
>>> Can you please ask upstream whether there are sources for 
>>>  libccd-1.5\doc\jgt98convex.pdf
>>> available? These should be put into the source tarball as well.
> 
> Issue sent: https://github.com/danfis/libccd/issues/9
> 
> In the best of the cases, upstream will include the sources and make a
> new release. Can we re-submit the package without this done or I should
> wait until the new release?
> 
>>> Maybe you can also tell upstream to include the file BDS-LICENSE that 
>>> is mentioned in all file headers :-).
> 
> I'm not sure if I'm not looking at the right place, but there is a
> BSD-LICENSE file in directory.
> 
> Thanks.
> 


-- 
Jose Luis Rivero <jrivero at osrfoundation.org>