Bug#741196: libpetsc3.4.2: libpetsc.so.3.4.2 links with both GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries
Francesco Poli
invernomuto at paranoici.org
Wed May 21 19:57:19 UTC 2014
On Thu, 15 May 2014 00:46:35 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2014 16:41:46 +0200 Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > Control: severity -1 important
> > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> >
> > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 00:41:10 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> [...]
> > > Regardless of what the license is *intended* to be, CeCILL-C in fact
> > > includes restrictions not present in the GNU GPL and has no explicit
> > > conversion-to-GPL clause, unlike the CeCILL license.
> > >
> > > As a consequence, CeCILL-C really appears to be GPL-incompatible,
> > > unfortunately...
> > >
[...]
> > >
> > Since I disagree, I'd like you to get that confirmed in an authoritative
> > statement from ftpmaster. In the meantime, I'll downgrade this bug.
>
> I am not sure I understand what you are disagreeing about.
>
> What I say is:
>
> (A) the CeCILL-C license includes some restrictions (at the very
> least, a choice of venue clause) which are not present in the GNU GPL
> v2 (or later)
>
> (B) the CeCILL-C license does not include any explicit
> conversion-to-GPL (or to any other license) clause
>
> (C) a license which includes restrictions not present in the GNU GPL
> is GPL-incompatible, unless it has an explicit
> conversion-to-GPL-compatible-license clause
>
> Which point are you disagreeing on?
> Please clarify.
>
> Thanks for your time.
Dear FTP Masters,
I've been asked by Julien Cristau (who reads this message in copy) to
get a confirmation in an "authoritative statement from ftpmaster" that
the CeCILL-C license is GPL-incompatible.
As you can read above, I asked him to clarify what he is disagreeing
about, but I haven't received any reply.
Please read the full #741196 bug log, if you need more context.
If you agree with me that CeCILL-C is GPL-incompatible, then I think
that the severity of bug #741196 should be raised again to "serious"
and its "moreinfo" tag should be removed.
Could you please express your opinion?
Thanks for your time!
Bye.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20140521/5a6559ea/attachment.sig>
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list