Bug#764050: marked as done (libopenblas-base: alternative libblas.so.3gf can't be slave of libblas.so.3)

Sat Nov 1 20:48:10 UTC 2014

Your message dated Sat, 01 Nov 2014 21:44:31 +0100
with message-id <1414874671.4632.14.camel at debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#764049: Bug can be closed
has caused the Debian Bug report #764049,
regarding libopenblas-base: alternative libblas.so.3gf can't be slave of libblas.so.3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

-- 
764049: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=764049
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Guido Seifert <wargand at gmx.de>
Subject: libopenblas-base: alternative libblas.so.3gf can't be slave of libblas.so.3
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 05:46:36 +0200
Size: 2717
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20141101/c11370bc/attachment-0002.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien?= Villemot <sebastien at debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#764049: Bug can be closed
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 21:44:31 +0100
Size: 3659
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20141101/c11370bc/attachment-0003.mht>