Bug#769529: libgazebo-dev: arch-dependent file in "Multi-Arch: same" package

[Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda]

A Divendres, 14 de novembre de 2014, Jakub Wilk va escriure:
> Package: libgazebo-dev
> Version: 3.0.0+dfsg-3
> Severity: important
> User: multiarch-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: multiarch
> 
> libgazebo-dev is marked as "Multi-Arch: same", but the following file is 
> architecture-dependent:
> 
> /usr/include/gazebo-3.0/gazebo/test/test_config.h
> 
> An example diff between i386 and amd64 is attached.
> 

looking the diffs it seems not important:

-#define TEST_INTEGRATION_PATH 
"/build/gazebo-7iodgn/gazebo-3.0.0+dfsg/test/integration"
-#define TEST_REGRESSION_PATH 
"/build/gazebo-7iodgn/gazebo-3.0.0+dfsg/test/regression"
-#define TEST_UNIT_PATH "/build/gazebo-7iodgn/gazebo-3.0.0+dfsg/test/unit"
-#define TEST_PATH "/build/gazebo-7iodgn/gazebo-3.0.0+dfsg/test"
-#define PROJECT_SOURCE_PATH "/build/gazebo-7iodgn/gazebo-3.0.0+dfsg"
-#define PROJECT_BINARY_PATH "/build/gazebo-7iodgn/gazebo-3.0.0+dfsg/obj-i586-
linux-gnu"
+#define TEST_INTEGRATION_PATH "/build/gazebo-
EIYM8G/gazebo-3.0.0+dfsg/test/integration"
+#define TEST_REGRESSION_PATH "/build/gazebo-
EIYM8G/gazebo-3.0.0+dfsg/test/regression"
+#define TEST_UNIT_PATH "/build/gazebo-EIYM8G/gazebo-3.0.0+dfsg/test/unit"
+#define TEST_PATH "/build/gazebo-EIYM8G/gazebo-3.0.0+dfsg/test"
+#define PROJECT_SOURCE_PATH "/build/gazebo-EIYM8G/gazebo-3.0.0+dfsg"
+#define PROJECT_BINARY_PATH "/build/gazebo-EIYM8G/gazebo-3.0.0+dfsg/obj-
x86_64-linux-gnu"


I don't know if this include are used a lot. Maybe it could be dropped. Jose, 
what do you think?

However, in any case this bug is NOT important IMHO:

important
    a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a package, without 
rendering it completely unusable to everyone.

I would like to know if this package lose usability for this include.


-- 
--
Linux User 152692     PGP: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-------------------------------------
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20141114/2856c292/attachment-0001.sig>