Bug#765795: openblas: new upstream version (0.2.12)

Ghislain Vaillant ghisvail at gmail.com
Sat Oct 18 12:47:07 UTC 2014


No problem. I know that the upcoming freeze makes for very tight 
timings. I will leave it like that until Jessie's release then. Besides, 
the changelog list does not that big so the most severe bugs should be 
manageable by subsequent patching.

Merci Sebastien,
Ghis



On 18/10/14 12:40, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Le samedi 18 octobre 2014 à 10:08 +0100, Ghislain Antony Vaillant a
> écrit :
>> Source: openblas
>> Severity: wishlist
>>
>> Dear Maintainer,
>>
>> A new upstream version has been released (0.2.12) with a bunch of fixes [1]. For some reasons, the PTS failed to track the new release though uscan picks it up.
> I am not sure I can get this version into Jessie. The reason is that I
> want first version 0.2.11-3 to migrate to jessie, since it contains
> coordinated changes (blas.pc/lapack.pc) with the other BLAS
> implementations. The migration should happen October 25th if everything
> goes well. Then I could upload 0.2.12, which will take 10 days to
> migrate, so maybe it can make it before the freeze (November 5th), but
> the time margin is very tight (I am actually not even sure that this is
> feasible).
>
> Uploading 0.2.12 right now would mean taking the risk of not having the
> coordinated changes (blas.pc/lapack.pc) in jessie (because 0.2.12 could
> introduce new problems), and I don't want to take that risk.
>
> In the worst case, if 0.2.12 does not make it into jessie, it will still
> possible to fix issues in jessie that are of severity important or
> higher (in practice, that means crashes or wrong calculated results). If
> you are aware of such fixes that are incorporated into 0.2.12, you can
> either tell me or open new bugs against openblas (linking to upstream
> bug reports and commits).
>
> Thanks,
>



More information about the debian-science-maintainers mailing list