Bug#791027: eclib: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Simon McVittie
smcv at debian.org
Mon Aug 10 10:41:40 UTC 2015
On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 at 13:09:44 +0000, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package
> maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might
> break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built
> against these packages.
There don't seem to be any rdeps.
smcv at coccia:~$ dak rm -R -n eclib
Will remove the following packages from unstable:
eclib | 20150510-2 | source
eclib-tools | 20150510-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
libec-dev | 20150510-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
libec2 | 20150510-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers <debian-science-maintainers at lists.alioth.debian.org>
------------------- Reason -------------------
----------------------------------------------
Checking reverse dependencies...
No dependency problem found.
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list