Bug#794736: libvigraimpex: library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default

[Andreas Metzler]

On 2015-08-13 Daniel Stender <debian at danielstender.com> wrote:
> We have a SONAME bump happening due to the Vigra 1.10.0 transition
> [1] which generally could let spare a "v5" package when the two
> transitions would be combined, isn't it?

> However, I think it's better to adopt what has been already changed
> for 1.10.0+dfsg-9ubuntu1 to update Vigra for 15.10 (renaming
> libvigraimpex5 to libvigraimpexv5 and rebuild) - there's really no
> need to avoid this.

I think that  is sensible., too.

> We have some other serious issues open for Vigra (with the Lenna
> image set [2] and test suite problems in Mips), so I suggest we do
> it that way: I'm going to prepare a "v5" 1.9.0+dfsg-11 for unstable
> in the next days and check the reverse deps. After that we go for a
> "v5" 1.10.0+dfsg-10 in experimental and check the reverse deps on
> that, that would close the stdc++6 transition as the next thing to
> do on Vigra.
[...]

I would suggest to make a "v5" for /experimental/ ASAP to minimize
delay due to new processing.

cu Andreas

-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'