Bug#741196: License incompatibility below RC threshold
rra at debian.org
Thu Jan 8 02:49:23 UTC 2015
Francesco Poli <invernomuto at paranoici.org> writes:
> Dear Release Team,
> I am concerned that a license incompatibility (bug #741196 and the
> other similar bug reports against other packages) might slip through
> into the jessie release without being noticed or addressed adequately.
> Please read #741196 bug log, or, at least:
For those who are curious what this is about, it's a library that links
with both libraries covered under the GNU GPL v2 or later and the CeCILL-C
v1.0 license. Francesco believes these are incompatible licenses and has
asserted this in multiple bugs, but does not appear to have presented any
actual evidence of that. The FSF doesn't state a position on CeCILL-C,
but explicitly says that CeCILL v2 is a GPL-compatible license .
Wikipedia claims that CeCILL-C is compatible with the GNU LGPL v2, which
would also make it compatible with the GNU GPL v2. CeCILL-C is a
less-restrictive version of CeCILL, so it would make sense for it to be
The only specific claim that Francesco has made that I was able to find is
that the choice of venue clause in CeCILL-C makes it incompatible.
However, CeCILL also contains a choice of venue clause, and the FSF state
that it is GPL-compatible. Given that they base those determinations on
the advice of lawyers, I'm dubious of this argument.
> What do you think should be done?
Nothing, in the absence of more credible evidence that there is a license
Russ Allbery (rra at debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
More information about the debian-science-maintainers