Bug#776633: marked as done (alternative libblas.so.3gf can't be slave of libblas.so.3: it is a master alternative)

Fri Jan 30 12:54:06 UTC 2015

Your message dated Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:51:45 +0100
with message-id <1422622305.5377.18.camel at krishna.villemot.name>
and subject line Re: Bug#776633: alternative libblas.so.3gf can't be slave of libblas.so.3: it is a master alternative
has caused the Debian Bug report #776633,
regarding alternative libblas.so.3gf can't be slave of libblas.so.3: it is a master alternative
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

-- 
776633: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776633
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b at web.de>
Subject: alternative libblas.so.3gf can't be slave of libblas.so.3: it is a master alternative
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 11:47:06 +0100
Size: 2405
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20150130/78312b7b/attachment.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien?= Villemot <sebastien at debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#776633: alternative libblas.so.3gf can't be slave of libblas.so.3: it is a master alternative
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:51:45 +0100
Size: 4376
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20150130/78312b7b/attachment-0001.mht>